The present is the age of information explosion. Information is knowledge. Information is power. Secrecy is the bulwark of inefficient and corrupt administration while transparency is the hallmark of honest and efficient administration. Democratic government requires openness and transparency in governance of the country. It is the basis of the demand of information justice. Freedom of information is the oxygen of democracy.
The Right to Information Act, 2005 is a law enacted by the PARLIAMENT OF INDIA giving citizens of INDIA access to records of CENTRAL GOVERNMENT and STATE GOVERNMENTS. The Act applies to all States and Union Territories of India, except the State of Jammu and Kashmir, which is covered under a State-level law. Private bodies are not within the Act’s ambit directly. However, information that can be accessed under any other law in force by a public authority can also be requested for. In a landmark decision of (‘Sarbajit Roy versus DERC’) the Central Information Commission also reaffirmed that privatized public utility companies continue to be within the ambit the RTI Act notwithstanding their privatization. The Act also explicitly overrides the Official Secrets Act and other laws in force to the extent of any inconsistency.
Under the provisions of the Act, any citizen may request information from a “public authority” (a body of Government or “instrumentality of State”) which is required to reply expeditiously or within thirty days. The Act also requires every public authority to computerise their records for wide dissemination and to proactively publish certain categories of information so that the citizens need minimum recourse to request for information formally.
Experts feel that as the Act aims at making the government transparent and more accountable. The effective use of it would, in a long run, curb corruption much like the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in the United States, the RTI sets out procedures for citizen to “secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority.”
To begin with a snapshot of the Act’s structure, basically, the RTI allows the citizens to make initial requests for information to designated officers located in the relevant government authorities. If the request is denied or the citizen receives no response, he can appeal to the information officer’s superior and/or the information commissions established by the RTI, which have been given the rather Orwellian names of the “Central Information Commission” and “State Information Commissions,” respectively. If the citizen does not receive a response within thirty days, the public authority can be fined, although the amount of the fine is capped.
One of the RTI’s main strengths is its definition of “information,” which is broadly defined as “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic from and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any law for the time being in force.” This definition turned out to be too broad for some politicians in 2005, officials floated a possible amendment to the RTI that would have excluded handwritten notes from the Act, but the public outcry was so intense that the proposed amendment was discarded.
Under the Act, all complying departments must appoint their Public Information Officer (PIO). Any citizen of India may submit a request to the PIO for information in any format, paper or electronic. It is the PIO’s responsibility to ensure that the information is obtained from the appropriate department or section. If the request pertains to another public authority (in whole or part) it is the PIO’s responsibility to transfer/forward the concerned portions of the request to a PIO of the other Dept. within 5 days. In addition, every public authority is required to designate Assistant Public Information Officer (APIOs) to receive RTI requests and appeal for forwarding to the PIOs of their public authority. The citizen making the request is not obliged to explain why the information is needed.
The Act specifies the following time limits for replying to the request: